Shakespeare's Sonnets (and why I stopped blogging)

Shakespeare Sonnets (154 of them published "officially" in 1640) -- enjoy!

You know Sonnet 18.

Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?

Thou art more lovely and more temperate:

Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,

And summer's lease hath all too short a date...

So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,

So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.

Heart be still. Are his ending couplets amazing or what? I read these aloud on the eliptical. Had to get some exercise but I didn't want to stop my school work. The final exam for 16th c. lit. is a week from Monday. Yikes! I've never spent so much time reading, studying and writing for a class in my life. This was a tough one. That's the reason for the big gap in my blog writing.

These sonnets were fun to read again. Shakespeare is truly amazing. I think you appreciate him more when you read the work of his contemporaries. I mean, they're all good -- I'm a big fan of Marlowe and I really liked Sidney -- but Will is heads and tails above the rest. His words could turn granite into butter. What a crappy metaphor. Oh well, I tried, in honor of The Man.

So, I guess Shakespeare may have been homosexual, but more likely, he was a heterosexual with homosexual lapses, or maybe the other way around. Why literary scholars focus so much on the sexuality of writers is beyond me. But then, as now, sex sells, I guess. I didn't read all the sonnets; we were assigned certain ones. So I can't comment with confidence on whether he was writing about a woman or man. Seems more often to be a woman. One of the sonnets (135) uses the word "Will" over and over again in different contexts. One interpretation is that "Will" is Will's dick. Apparently it was quite large. That's all I'm saying about that.

Astrophil and Stella

Note: Astrophil and Stella (the complete sonnets are provided here) was written by the romantic courtier, knight, soldier and realist Sir Philip Sidney. It was first printed in 1591.

Looking for a little romance on a snowy Saturday night? Start a fire or fill the tub, light some candles, open a little bubbly or a nice Zin and read some of Sidney's sonnets aloud. Maybe even sing the songs. That was my suggestion. Yeah, right. We're going to the Iggy-Heights game. Almost as romantic. Patriarchy lives on.

I gotta tell ya, Sidney, aka Astrophil, sure had it bad for Lady Penelope (Devereux) Rich, aka Stella. (Most scholars agree this sonnet series was autobiographical.) Ol' Sid didn't seem to have a problem letting the world know he was hot for her either, despite the fact Penelope was married. (For the record, some say he wrote them before she was married. I don't buy it.) He wrote 108 14-line rhyming verses about his love for her, the rejection, the reciprocation, the kiss, and then refusal to submit. Here's how it starts...

Louing in trueth, and fayne in verse my loue to show,

That she, deare Shee, might take som pleasure of my paine,

Pleasure might cause her reade, reading might make her know,

Knowledge might pittie winee, and pity grace obtaine...

Biting my trewand pen, beating myselfe for spite,

Fool, said my Muse to me, looke in they heart, and write.

Then off he goes. Talk about pining! You probably noticed, he doesn't mention Stella by name at first. But he ultimately caves and spills all. Want some more enlightenment? "The three central conceits (ideas) in any collection of Petrarchan love sonnets," according to literary scholar A.C. Hamilton, "is beauty, love and virtue in that order." Sidney was certainly a student of Petrarch. Astrophil is attracted by Stella's beauty, which leads to him falling in love with her but then her virtue, while admirable, sends him packing. Sidney uses a lot of poetic devices, like oxymorons, mythology and personification. The language is beautiful and the rhythm is, well, musical. Critic Janet MacArthur says Sidney's Astrophil and Stella is "true to the facts." Sidney takes a Protestant approach (integrating nature and mankind) and draws from real life (as opposed to the more allegorical technique used by his contemporary, Spenser. It's an "expressive realist text, expressive of the personal rather than the universal, however." MacArthur goes on to explain, "the poem is viewed not only as an intermediate stage in the evolution of literary forms, but also plays a part of the rejection of the idealogy of Catholic Europe."

I just like reading them and imagining that I'm in QEI's court with my knight in shining armor whispering sweet iambic pantameter in my ear.

Book Club at Rhonda's

We had book club at Rhonda's on Thursday night -- Rhonda always has the best wine. This week she served an array of delicacies. We discussed Why I am a Catholic by Garry Wills. I'm too busy and not interested enough to write much about it (it's way after the fact; I've just been too busy!) -- but I must say the book did generate some interesting discussion about religion and some of our personal beliefs. It was a very good bookclub meeting. I originally got the book because I was struggling with the hierarchy and decision-making in the Roman Catholic church and with the egos at my own local church. But I let it sit on my shelf for a long time. Then Linda was asking about the Catholic church when her granddaughter was being baptized. So I mentioned this book and agreed to do the discussion guide. I got kudos for the guide. I'll plug it in later if I remember. It did get me thinking and a little more educated about the papacy. Can't say I'd enthusiastically recommend, but I'm happy I read it.

Costco's Kirkland Wine

If you are in an area where there's a Costco, you are fortunate. They often buy excess wine from good wineries and slap their own label on it. The Costco brand is called Kirkland. I'll research the background a bit further but suffice it to say for now, it's good stuff. We had a 2005 Cabernet Sauvignon from Napa and the 2005 Signature Merlot. Both cost less than $20 and were fabulous. Of course, my taste, again, is the full body, rich dark fruits (plums, blackberries, cherries) and mocha/cocoa. Both of these had a lot of that stuff going on.

I'm telling you, it's as good as a lot of $40-60 wine I've had. The thing about Costco wine is that you never know just what you'll get. At least that's what I've heard from some of the "experts." We met a woman wine maker in Sonoma who had some inside knowledge of this. Her advice about the Kirkland wines was to buy a bottle, take it out to you car, open it and try it. If it's good, go back and buy a case or two because it won't be the same wine a week from now. When it's good, it's good, and you need to make hay while the sun shines!

Anniversary Weekend

oops! accidently posted this to my work blog initially....

Anniversary Weekend
Busy weekend. Linda and George came over Friday evening -- two friends who recently quit their jobs (well, technically George is still working) to sail around the world. They bought a catamaran about a year ago and have been up and down the coast for a year while they tried to sell their house. We celebrated the closing with a great bottle of Field Stone cab (2004) and some steak kabobs. This wine is fabulous!! A lot of dark fruit.... The winemakers add a little merlot to the cab for added "depth and complexity." Jim and Joanne turned us on to this winery and we had a chance to visit again several months ago when in California for a conference. Still have a few bottles left from that purchase. Yummers! After that,we had a bottle of BV (Beaulieu Vineyard) cab (2005). "Black cherry, ripe plum and chocolate" is how the winery describes this bold, full-bodied wine. I always look for that. A cab or blend with the dark fruit flavors and chocolate... it's a "can't miss." Although I do like to explore outside of that safe zone on occasion.Saturday, Tom and I went to the Walden Barn in Aurora to celebrate our 12th wedding anniversary. Oh, first we enjoyed a glass of champagne. Nothing fancy but a fun way to kick off the evening (other details not for publication). Anyway, back to the Barn. We still had some Chateau Paveil De Luze 2002 Margaux in the cellar there. It was the wine we got for Tara's (my stepdaughter's) and Mark's wedding. And I think we only paid about $20-25 for a bottle back then. Boy did it age well. It was nice at the wedding (two years ago) but wow, it really improved. We enjoyed the last bottle on Saturday, though, unfortunately. The winery, I guess, dates back to the very early 17th century and is known for its "red currant and truffle bouquet." Arguably not the best pairing with my escargot, crab cakes and mussels but I wouldn't have changed it. White wine is for wimps.
Posted by Beth at 9:27 AM on Sunday


1 comments:
bachmann said...
Congratulations on 12 years. That's just great.The Bachmanns also popped a few choice bottle this weekend. On Saturday we emptied several bottles of Holy Moses white Lager. A fine brew from our friends at GL brewery.We followed the next afternoon with some Red Stripe.
September 2, 2008 9:43 AM

Cheap Wine

I'm not a fan of Trader Joe's Two Buck Chuck . But I do like finding good wines for under $20. Or under $15 on occasion.

Tonight, we had a "Awesome Aussie Blend" (those words appears right on the bottle). It was called "Vin" by Vin Hunter. $12!!!!! Are you kidding me?? 2004 vintage, a Heinen's limited release. We paid $12. Thank you Heinen's wine man. I feel lucky once again to live in Cleveland. Very nice with our pork briscuit. (We subscribe to the theory that white wine is good when your out of red wine so we pretty much drink red with anything.) This was a blend of merlot (50%), shiraz (30%) and cabernet sav. (20%). Can't go wrong. It was so good, we didn't have any wine left to go with our almost nightly dessert -- a piece of dark chocolate (min. 72% cocoa).

That reminds me, Heinen's is awesome for wine, especially if you're an amateur like me. Wonderful wine buyers happy to help you. And they have tastings all the time. For a quarter on the weekend, you can try three or four wines and learn. They also have regular wine events. Only problem is, when we have a good wine, we're left wanting more... Actual time of post: about 9 p.m. Apparently, I opened the window earlier so it registered that time. I'm still learning about this blogging stuff... :)

Blend

Last night's wine: C

We had a $20 (reg $25) bottle of 2006 (way too young) Blackstone Rubric Reserve from Sonoma. It was a blend of cabernet sauvignon, merlot, syrah, cabernet franc, petite syrah and tannat. I usually love blends of cabs and syrahs but this was just ok. Not very good with the lamb chops we had for dinner. Decent by itself (considering the price and vintage) and pretty good with dark chocolate (but it's hard to go wrong pairing red wine with chocolate). We should have listened to the adage: Drink no wine before its time. It needed to sit. The plum fruit was just starting to come out. I'd try it again in a year.

First Post

This is hard. The first post. And the wine I had last night was swill. And it was white.

I'm reading two books right now (three if you count the Insight Guide to Italy), but I'm not far enough along with them to comment. The one I'm reading for book club is Garry Wills' Why I am a Catholic. This is really out of character for us. We usually read classics or novels with some type of interesting historic or cultural backdrop. This book came up because Linda's granddaughter was going to be baptized Catholic and she didn't know much about Catholicism. She started quizzing me about my religion and I couldn't help much. I mentioned I bought this book awhile back (when I was having trouble understanding why I was a Catholic) and never read it but thought it might provide some interesting insights. We'll see....

The other thing I'm reading is The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat as Peformed by the Inmates of the Asylum of Charenton under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade, a play by Peter Weiss. That's my first assignment this semester in 16th Century Literature. Francis X. Ryan, SJ (hmmm, wonder what the X stands for) admitted starting a course dealing with Tudor literature with a play from the 20th century is rather odd. (I thought so but, then again, all my John Carroll professors have done similar things. We studied every playwright but Shakespeare in my Shakespeare class.) Anyway, Dr. Ryan says, "the play highlights the vast ideological difference between what concepts and beliefs we take for granted and those which were foundational values of 16th century England -- obedience, for instance. This will be the fourth class I've taken at JCU, working toward my MA in Creative Writing -- just for fun. I have a real job. Two classes I took right after college -- about 25 years ago -- also transferred. So I think I have another 5 or so to go after this. I didn't think I'd be anxious to finish because I'm doing it for the joy of reading and discussing literature and the opportunity to learn from other writers. But suddenly, I want to be done. I think if I was retired, it would be a different story. But the demands of work make the demands of school a little less "joyful." Was this a terrible first post?